|
Darkness
by
IseFire
- Wed 05/12/04; 8:26 pm EST
From
IseFire reader, Scott Bramlett:
The first thing I heard this morning on the radio was a report that
a man had been decapitated in Iraq. The execution was video taped.
The images made it to the Internet. And all of these things were
seen as good by those who murdered this man. It has caused me grief
and rage all day. Why has this one thing...as opposed to the whole
terrible war from which this act has sprung? I am not sure, but
conjecture follows.
The
newscast was the first thing I heard on the radio this morning,
right after waking up. This means consciousness was a little soft,
not so protected. The idea of this horror made it to the core of
cognition, and then thought kept turning it over and over. And the
way my thought worked this morning was that I found myself first
in the place of this man, Nick Berg, and then that of his family.
From Nick Berg, I extrapolated the simple truth of the delicacy
and tenderness of all human flesh, how quickly we feel pain. From
this, I considered the delicacy of the human mind and how quickly
it darkens under brutality and suffering, the terror of unfathomable
darkness, the merciless and final separation from everything dear.
War
forgets all of this. It sets an abstract ideal over the quotidian
domain of human experience, pain and bliss, both. The reality of
war puts these things second. It demands this demotion of human
reality to meet its ends. But the world only becomes real for humanity
in general in individual human hearts. This is why each brutal movement,
each act of violence and terror darkens the whole of humanity's
experience, because each of us is humanity in the particular. All
these particular concrete existences go to form that large abstract
concept. This is why killing in all but the rarest of instances
(perhaps that of mercy killing) is a crime against humanity, and
why each murder that is ever perpetrated is a crime against humanity,
whether in war, or on our streets in so-called peacetime.
We
are now not only at war, but are at war under false pretences. This
is a terrible, terrible conflict, and will, I am sure, be universally
considered a high crime years (and hopefully not many) from now.
It is difficult to go about my normal business, having entertained
these considerations. Still conscience demands movement, the taking
of some action.
I've
been discussing Mr. Berg's murder with colleagues today. For many,
it is clear that the blame for the current wave of horrors is in
the hands of this nation's executive. It is difficult to fathom
that George W. Bush remains in office after it has become all too
clear that he led this country to battle in Iraq, having obfuscated
the awful events of September 11, 2001 as the basis for such an
action. Not yet has any connection been shown between the terrorist
attacks on that day and the nation of Iraq. In light if this, how
is it, my colleagues and I wonder, that President Bush is still
happily perched in his seat in the Oval Office, but President Clinton
was impeached by Congress for acts far less deadly and dishonest?
Having asked the question, the one thing that looms large as an
answer to my heartache and that of many of this country's citizens
is the expulsion of George W. Bush and his henchmen from their offices
as administrators of the American government. It is this, or despair,
a world gone dark not only for Nick Berg, but for us all.
"We
tried it in the paddies, now let's try it in the sand!" The
idiocy of Bush's decision to invade Iraq
by
IseFire
- Wed 05/12/04; 9:06 pm EST
I'm
sitting here this evening watching Battlefield
Vietnam on the Discovery
Times channel, and am more convinced than ever that
if Club Shrub members Bush (who sort of flew in the then-called
"champagne unit" unit in Texas during the war...when he
bothered to show up) and Cheney (who got five deferments while John
Kerry bled and fought) they would not have decided
to play invader-generals and attack Iraq.
The documentary's narrative includes lines about
*American troops' initial over-reliance on training native troops
to fight their own war;
*the doctrine of superior firepower ("shock and awe,"
anyone?)--a tactic that ultimately never prevented guerillas from
"slipping through the net" and caused a high number of
civilian casualties, thereby turning the people against the Americans--
*U.S. preparation for conventional warfare and under-appreciation
of the effectiveness of enemy guerilla tactics;
*initial high morale among U.S. troops;
*the extreme climate; and
*The foreign nature of the native people and their culture.
Limiting free speech during the GOP convention in NYC
by
IseFire
- Tue 05/11/04; 8:56 pm EST
The
New York Times today ran an
editorial against the Citys failure to suggest
a protest site (or march routes) as an alternative to Central Park,
which they refuse to let protesters use for a rally during the RNC
convention.
The
editorial does not make it clear that permits for marches and rallies
go to different city agencies, and NYC Parks & Recreation only
has jurisdiction over the rally, not the march.
(How Mayor Bloomberg will attempt also to limit the march has yet
to be fully revealed.)
When
chairing Manhattan Community Board 5's parks committee, I routinely
took up for discussion proposals for parkland improvement. The parks
department receives less than 1% of the citys budget. What
they are able to accomplish, largely through monetary corporate
and private gifts, is impressive. I know the countless hours of
labor and many thousands of dollars the upkeep of Central Park requires.
But
HELLO?!?! it's a public park, and there is simply
no alternative location in Manhattan for a 250,000-person rally.
My
proposal: as rally attendees leave the park
the organizers, United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ), can have volunteers
with donation buckets at the exits. If each attendee gave only $1,
UFPJ would end up making a $250,000 contribution to New York
City Parks & Recreation. (And trust me, they need the money!)
Keeping
George W. Bush safe from protesters' freedom of speech...
by
IseFire
- Tue 05/11/04; 7:34 am EST
AP:
"Security
costs for the Republican National Convention this
summer will hit $76 million, says [New York City] police Commissioner
Ray Kelly."
Rest
assured, my fellow Americans...
by
IseFire
- Mon 05/10/04; 8:04 pm EST
Oh,
we of little faith! Who are we so to fret even as God has found
fit to give us His chosen leader to bring us through the night?
All will be well--just ask Dana,
she'll paint you a picture of blessed assurance.
Video
by
IseFire
- Sun 05/09/04; 1:54 Pm EST
There's
also video
related to Steve's men on Fox News' site. Steve's sister Allison:
Look under "Related Information" then "Related
Video" for the clips. The most recent clip is at the top of
the "Related Video" list. The clip listed after it occurred
the night before, I believe.
Those
Are Steve's Guys In The New York Times, and He's Quoted!
by
IseFire
- Sun 05/09/04; 10:34 am EST
"Captain Steve," who've I've been writing about (see here),
was quoted
in The New York Times, and the men of his company (200+ men
under Steve's command) are the ones in the photos of fighting in
Karbala! I'm proud of him and scared for him, too. Please keep him
in your thoughts and prayers.
From a May 7 article by Edward Wong and Maria Newman: "I
think they had enough today," Captain Adcock said of the insurgents
as he chewed on a cigar after today's fighting. "They may get
ready and go back tonight. But right now they've had enough."
 
He's
identified in the article as "Robert Adcock." (He goes
by his middle name, Steve.)
Both his sister and I overlooked his quotes in the paper this week,
for which we're kicking ourselves since it means we don't have original
copies. If you've got my number and have copies of last week's papers,
please call.
Call
for PM Blair to resign for sake of Labour victory
by
IseFire
- Sun 05/09/04; 2:48 am EST
A friend of Tony Blair, Lord David Puttnam, has publicly stated
that he thinks Prime
Minister Blair should resign, lest he drag the Labour
Party to defeat.
Should Blair step aside, the popular Chancellor of the Exchequer,
Gordon
Brown, would likely lead a Labour government. A Brown
legacy was already established when the Chancellor made the Bank
of England independent seven years ago, a move that economists and
politicians alike have highly praised.
New
blogs
by
IseFire
- Sat 05/08/04; 3:06 pm EST

Welcome two new blogs to Isebrand.com's blogroll: Blog
for Victory, which I add a bit reluctantly since
it's an institution's blog, not a private citizen's, and Democratic
Veteran, which is a fantastic blog.
Why
Media Matters matters greatly
by
IseFire
- Sat 05/08/04; 2:48 pm EST
Two posts about Media
Matters in one week...but listening to David Brock
on The
O'Franken Factor this week, I came to fully appreciate
that Media
Matters means to counter conservative lies on TV,
radio, and in print real-time. So it's really going to be
important to check Media
Matters at least once a day if you want to be a front-line
defender as dangerous waves of ugly lies daily, hourly, crash against
the truth seeking to destroy it....
Rummy's
tummy's upset, I bet
by
IseFire
- Thru 05/06/04; 9:36 pm EST
Club Shrub's frontman, George W. Bush himself, publicly took
to task one of the club's own members, Secretary
of Defense and longtime rival of George H. W. Bush, Donald Rumsfled.
Poor Rummy...his arrogance and carelessness are coming to light.
Good time to revisit conservative
columnist David Hackworth's warnings about Rummy
issued by back in August. About Hackworth from a Common
Dreams interview: Hackwork was wounded eight times
(his left leg still carries a bullet from the Vietnam War)...Hackworth
has seen more combat and taken more bullets than almost any American
soldier still alive.
Hackworth,
having received countless e-mails from soldiers in Iraq--concluded
that Rumsfeld had gotten the U.S. and our troops into a mess, and
called for his dismissal.
|